Epstein's $100M Payment to Wexner After Theft Claims
In a bombshell revelation that's reigniting scrutiny on one of America's retail titans, disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein reportedly paid Les Wexner, the founder of L Brands, a staggering $100 million following accusations of theft. This development, detailed in recent Financial Times reporting, sheds new light on the enigmatic relationship between the two men, whose ties have long been a source of speculation and controversy.
Who is Les Wexner?
Leslie Herbert Wexner, often simply known as Les Wexner, is a name synonymous with the American retail landscape. Born in 1937 in Dayton, Ohio, Wexner founded The Limited in 1963, which evolved into L Brands—a conglomerate that includes powerhouse brands like Victoria's Secret, Bath & Body Works, and Pink. At its peak, L Brands was a retail behemoth, with Wexner amassing a fortune estimated at over $6 billion, making him one of the wealthiest individuals in the fashion and apparel sector.
Wexner's business acumen transformed intimate apparel and casual wear into global phenomena. Victoria's Secret, under his stewardship, became a cultural icon, famous for its annual fashion show that blended glamour, fantasy, and commerce. However, Wexner's empire wasn't without its challenges. In recent years, L Brands has faced declining sales, activist investor pressures, and a pivot away from the traditional mall-based model amid the rise of e-commerce giants like Amazon.
Beyond retail, Wexner is a notable philanthropist. He and his wife, Abigail, established the Wexner Foundation, focusing on Jewish leadership and education. The couple has donated hundreds of millions to causes ranging from Ohio State University to medical research, cementing Wexner's legacy as a community pillar in Columbus, where L Brands is headquartered.
The Epstein Connection: A Timeline of Trust and Betrayal
Early Ties and Power of Attorney
The relationship between Wexner and Epstein dates back to the late 1980s. Epstein, then a rising star in finance with a mysterious client list, was introduced to Wexner through mutual connections in New York and Palm Beach circles. What began as financial advisory quickly deepened. In a move that raised eyebrows even at the time, Wexner granted Epstein power of attorney over his vast assets in 1991—a level of trust rarely bestowed, even among close family.
Epstein managed Wexner's real estate portfolio, including high-profile properties like a Manhattan townhouse later seized by authorities in Epstein's scandals. Reports suggest Epstein's involvement extended to personal matters, with Wexner providing Epstein with access to his network of elite contacts. This partnership propelled Epstein's aura of invincibility, but it also sowed seeds of future turmoil.
The Theft Accusations Emerge
By the mid-1990s, cracks appeared. Wexner accused Epstein of misappropriating around $46 million from his fortune, according to documents cited by the Financial Times. The allegations centered on unauthorized transfers and questionable financial maneuvers during Epstein's oversight of Wexner's investments. While details remain murky—protected by nondisclosure agreements—the fallout was swift. Wexner revoked Epstein's power of attorney in 2007, severing formal ties just as Epstein's own legal troubles began to surface.
Epstein's 2008 conviction for sex trafficking minors cast a long shadow over his associates, including Wexner. The retail magnate distanced himself publicly, claiming he was unaware of Epstein's criminal activities. Yet, questions persisted: How could someone with such intimate access to Wexner's life and finances remain oblivious?
The $100 Million Settlement: What It Reveals
The recent disclosure of the $100 million payment from Epstein to Wexner, made sometime after the theft accusations, adds a layer of complexity. Far exceeding the alleged $46 million stolen, the payout could represent restitution, interest, or even a hush-money arrangement to quietly resolve the dispute. Financial experts speculate it was structured to avoid litigation that might expose more about their dealings.
This settlement underscores the blurred lines between business and personal loyalty in elite circles. For Wexner, it was a financial win, but at what reputational cost? The payment came amid Epstein's mounting scandals, including his 2019 arrest and death in custody, which fueled conspiracy theories and renewed investigations into his enablers.
Impact on L Brands and the Retail World
The Epstein-Wexner saga has ripple effects on L Brands. In 2020, Wexner stepped down as CEO amid backlash, with investors citing the Epstein links as a governance failure. The company rebranded to Bath & Body Works Inc. in 2021, spinning off Victoria's Secret to distance itself from past controversies. Sales have stabilized, but the brand's image—once aspirational—now grapples with associations to exploitation and power imbalances.
In Australia, where L Brands products like Victoria's Secret are popular imports, the story resonates with growing consumer demands for ethical sourcing and corporate transparency. Local retailers face similar pressures, with scandals like this highlighting the global interconnectedness of supply chains and leadership accountability.
Broader Implications: Power, Privilege, and Accountability
Wexner's story is a cautionary tale of how unchecked trust in high-stakes partnerships can unravel empires. It parallels other Epstein-linked figures, from Bill Clinton to Prince Andrew, illustrating a web of influence that spanned finance, politics, and philanthropy. Legal experts note that while the statute of limitations may have expired on the theft claims, ongoing civil suits against Epstein's estate could drag Wexner's name back into the spotlight.
As investigations continue— including U.S. lawmakers' calls for probes into Epstein's ties—Wexner remains largely out of the public eye, focusing on family and philanthropy from his Ohio base. At 86, his net worth has dipped below $6 billion, but his influence endures.
This episode reminds us that in the world of billionaires, financial settlements often mask deeper truths. For consumers and investors alike, it's a call to scrutinize the leaders behind the brands we trust.
Word count: 782
