Kyle Rittenhouse's Controversial Theory on Fluoride and Sexual Orientation
In a recent social media post, Kyle Rittenhouse, the 23-year-old who was acquitted of murder charges in 2021, has once again sparked controversy with a bizarre claim about fluoride in drinking water. The post has drawn widespread criticism and debate, with health experts debunking the theory and social media users reacting with a mix of disbelief and anger.
The Controversial Post
On January 9, 2026, Rittenhouse wrote on X (formerly Twitter): "Prove me wrong. The fluoride in our water is making people gay. Drink clean water." The statement immediately drew attention and criticism from both the public and health authorities. Rittenhouse, who gained notoriety for his actions during the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests in Kenosha, Wisconsin, where he shot three people, has been a recurring figure in headlines since his acquittal.
Background on Kyle Rittenhouse
Rittenhouse was charged with multiple counts, including homicide, after the 2020 incident but was acquitted in November 2021. He has since been involved in several controversies, including his recent marriage to Bella Nelson Rittenhouse, which was announced with a controversial wedding photo featuring guns and assault rifles. His wife reportedly encouraged his return to social media after an extended break.
Expert Reactions and Debunking the Theory
Health authorities and experts have swiftly responded to Rittenhouse's claim, emphasizing that there is no scientific evidence linking fluoride to sexual orientation. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has repeatedly stated that fluoride at the recommended level of .07 milligrams per liter in drinking water is effective in preventing tooth decay and is safe for public health.
Scientific Evidence
A 2020 study noted that plasma fluoride levels can be related to lower testosterone and estradiol in male adolescents, but it explicitly stated that this does not impact sexual orientation. The study further emphasized that the effects observed were minor and not significant enough to alter sexual orientation.
Public Health Agencies' Stance
The CDC and other health agencies have consistently debunked misinformation about fluoride, underscoring its benefits for dental health. The community note attached to Rittenhouse's post also linked to the CDC for further reading, providing a direct counter to his claims.
Social Media Reaction
Reactions to Rittenhouse's post on social media have been largely negative, with many users mocking and criticizing his theory. One user commented, "But I grew up on well water?" while another said, "The kid isn't right in the head." Gaystarnews even reposted the story, writing, "Kyle girl you silly goose! You’re making us thirsty!"
Mixed Opinions
Despite the overwhelming criticism, a few users seemed to agree with Rittenhouse's theory. One commenter replied, "bingo" to his post, and another said, "It's the atrazine but yes its the water." However, these responses were met with further skepticism and mockery from others.
Legal and Public Perception
Rittenhouse's latest controversy comes at a time when he is trying to rebuild his public image. His marriage to Bella Nelson Rittenhouse and his return to social media were met with mixed feelings, but his fluoride theory has largely been condemned. The incident highlights the ongoing debate about misinformation and its impact on public health discussions.
The Broader Context
Fluoride has long been a subject of debate, with some groups advocating for its removal from drinking water due to unfounded health concerns. However, scientific consensus and regulatory bodies worldwide support the use of fluoride at recommended levels to improve dental health. Rittenhouse's claim adds to the misinformation surrounding this topic, further polarizing public opinion.
Conclusion
Kyle Rittenhouse's controversial theory about fluoride and sexual orientation has once again placed him in the spotlight for the wrong reasons. While his claim has been debunked by health experts, the incident underscores the importance of relying on scientific evidence and credible sources for health-related information. As the debate continues, it is crucial for the public to remain informed and critical of misinformation that can have real-world consequences.
