Lucy Letby Retrial: Mother's Heartfelt Testimony in New Documentary

Elena Hargrove

Feb 05, 2026 • 4 min read

A somber courtroom scene with a blurred figure in the dock, surrounded by legal documents and a gavel, evoking the tension of the Lucy Letby trial proceedings.

Lucy Letby Retrial: Mother's Anguish and Expert Doubts Fuel Calls for Justice Review

In a chilling new Netflix documentary, The Investigation of Lucy Letby, the mother of one of the infants allegedly murdered by neonatal nurse Lucy Letby opens up about her profound grief and the need to confront her daughter's killer in court. As campaigns questioning Letby's 2023 convictions gain momentum, whispers of a potential retrial are growing louder, casting a shadow over one of the UK's most harrowing criminal cases.

Background: The Lucy Letby Case That Shocked the Nation

Lucy Letby, once a seemingly dedicated nurse at the Countess of Chester Hospital's neonatal unit, was convicted in August 2023 of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder seven others between June 2015 and June 2016. The prosecution argued that Letby deliberately injected air into the infants' bloodstreams, poisoned them with insulin, and tampered with breathing tubes, leading to tragic outcomes during her shifts.

Letby, now 34, is serving 15 whole-life sentences, ensuring she will never be released. The case drew widespread media attention, with families left devastated and the public reeling from the betrayal of trust in healthcare professionals. However, since her convictions, a vocal defense campaign has emerged, backed by medical experts who claim the evidence was flawed and alternative explanations exist for the babies' collapses.

The push for a retrial intensified in late 2024 when Letby's new legal team, led by barrister Mark MacDonald, highlighted the absence of direct evidence—no CCTV footage, no eyewitnesses to wrongdoing, and no apparent motive. "No-one saw her do anything wrong," MacDonald asserts in the documentary, urging a fresh look at the case.

A Mother's Unbreakable Bond: The Story of Baby D

From Joyful Birth to Heartbreaking Loss

Speaking under the pseudonym 'Sarah' in the Netflix film, the mother of Baby D—referred to as 'Zoe'—recounts the 60-hour labor that preceded her daughter's birth in June 2015. Zoe, born prematurely, was rushed to intensive care but initially showed promising signs. "She was so fragile, small, and precious," Sarah recalls, her voice laden with emotion as she describes peering into the incubator.

Doctors assured the new parents that Zoe was responding well, with no red flags. Yet, less than 48 hours later, Sarah was jolted awake in the dead of night by a nurse. Wheeled into a resuscitation room, she witnessed a frantic scene: doctors battling to restart her tiny heart. Despite their efforts, Zoe could not be saved. "That was it. It was finished," Sarah says, her words echoing the raw confusion and rage that followed.

Letby was later convicted of murdering Zoe by injecting air into her bloodstream, a method prosecutors claimed was part of a pattern. Sarah's testimony adds a deeply personal layer to the case, humanizing the statistics and underscoring the long-term trauma inflicted on families.

Facing the Accused: A Courtroom Confrontation

Sarah's decision to attend Letby's trial was driven by a fierce maternal instinct. "I needed to face her," she explains. Seated just three meters from the defendant, Sarah endured Letby's repeated stares. "Every time she looked at me, I'd have to look down." This intense eye contact, she says, amplified her sense of failure as a mother who couldn't protect her child.

Years on, Sarah describes her life as enduring "storm after storm." The documentary captures her resilience, but also her hope for closure amid the swirling doubts about the convictions.

Investigative Insights: Police and Medical Perspectives

Cheshire Police's Relentless Pursuit

The Netflix production offers exclusive access to Cheshire Police investigators, including bodycam footage from Letby's three arrests between 2018 and 2019. Detectives detail the painstaking four-year probe that pieced together shift patterns linking Letby to the incidents. When deaths and collapses mysteriously shifted from nights to days after Letby was moved to day shifts, suspicions solidified.

Dr. John Gibbs, a consultant paediatrician who first flagged concerns in 2015, recalls Letby as unremarkable—"quiet," with nothing amiss initially. But as the toll mounted, her constant presence on duty raised alarms. Despite pushback from hospital management defending her, the consultants demanded her removal from the unit, paving the way for police involvement in 2017.

Expert Challenges: No Evidence of Deliberate Harm?

Countering the prosecution's narrative, the documentary features an international panel of neonatal experts assembled by Letby's defense in early 2025. Led by Canadian specialist Dr. Shoo Lee, the group reviewed each case and found no proof of murders. "We did not find any murders. In all cases, death could be explained by natural causes or medical errors," Lee stated at a press conference.

This revelation has sparked heated debate. Critics of the convictions argue that the original trial relied on circumstantial evidence and statistical anomalies, while proponents insist the pattern of harm was undeniable. The panel's findings, revealed amid ongoing appeals, have bolstered calls for a retrial or full review by the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC).

The Road to a Potential Retrial: What's Next?

As of February 2026, Letby remains in prison, but her legal team is optimistic. MacDonald points to procedural issues and evolving medical understanding of neonatal vulnerabilities. Public opinion is divided: polls show a mix of outrage at the suggestion of innocence and sympathy for evidentiary gaps.

The Countess of Chester Hospital has faced scrutiny too, with inquiries revealing delayed responses to early warnings. For families like Sarah's, any retrial means reliving the nightmare, but it could affirm or rectify a historic miscarriage of justice.

This case transcends crime—it's a cautionary tale about trust in institutions, the fragility of evidence in complex medical scenarios, and the enduring pain of loss. As the Netflix documentary streams to global audiences, it reignites questions: Who should we believe, and will truth prevail?

Word count: 748

Share this intelligence

Popular This Week